The examination of the importance of professional organizations in the formulation and implementation of ethical codes depends on certain specific parameters of operation of ethical considerations and the conception of the application of such code. While assessing professional bodies in this capacity, it is possible to postulate that the input of individual cases would offer standpoints from where one can appreciate influences of library and information science. Within this discussion, an assessment of such situations is intended to facilitate the development of an appreciation of each of these contributions, the processes involved in the development of ethical code, and the potential and power possessed during the implementation of such regulations.
In the capacity of each of the institutions involved in these processes, it is possible to consider the levels of influence possessed by either body, the possibilities of conflict between the code of ethics and institutional policies, and the ethical dilemma involved in the field. A full appreciation of professional values, in the context of the discussion of professional organization, includes the examination of relationships between such organizations. Each of these levels of interaction achieved between regulators facilitates the assessment of possibilities of jurisdiction, conflict, and restrictions to be observed in implementing codes. In this respect, the exploration of concepts relating to the three example bodies will limit itself towards assessment and comparison of values as opposed to the argumentative discussion of strengths or weaknesses. [Click Essay Writer to order your essay]
The ideology of institutional regulation versus policy based ethical standards rests on the necessity of ideal settings where professional can operate. Such idyllic settings would incorporate the ethical basis offered by a policy directed by central regulators and integrated into an institution within the ideals and operating principles of particular institutions. This concept is thus hinged on the requirement by the information community to define ethical lines in a bid to eliminate gray areas and ambiguity in the implementation of protocols in ethical guidelines. Given the capacities held by the three bodies in the discussion (CLA, ALA, and CILIP), the specific ideas presented are geared towards creating standardized ideologies for librarians and associations to delineate guiding principles for ethical operations.
Professional Ethical Codes in Library and Information Science
In the ALA, analysis of the recognition offered to ethical work doing, and the processes involved in the association forms the basis of research into ideal library standings. The definition of the values held is based on an official functional policy that not only assures the provision of suitable service within the profession, but it also allows the standard values to work (Broady-Preston, 2006). The most significant of these values are based on the facilitation of people in accessing and obtaining knowledge, information and the preservation of such information for the continuance of literacy. Such standings can be built on the commitments of the association in facilitating the codes through which professionalism is ensured. Rubin and Froehlich (2009) offer argumentative considerations on the intensity of implementation of these standards and further assesses the level of treatment accorded to various ethical predicaments as cases within the discussion. These considerations not only propose that a professional in the field engage the community, but it also creates an understanding towards the need for professionalism in the work process (Rubin and Froehlich, 2009). [“Write my essay for me?” Get help here.]
The assurances that the ALA offers towards knowledge and its users with preservation intends in both scenarios. Rubin and Froehlich (2009) further provide consideration on Ranganathan’s five laws, which are facilitative of library use. In the contemporary setting, the environment has changed to a setting where these principles are functional as base concepts rather than directives. The creation of additional guidelines within the ALA, therefore, borrows from this platform. In the creation of these policies, the association attempts to recognize the significance of internal ideals compared to their process of codifying and notifying the public of these standards (Rubin and Froehlich, 2009). Since the ALA carries a significant sway on the decision-making processes in both creation and implementation, it can be considered as among the most substantial contributor to national (and international) standards for librarians and other information service handlers.
Similarly, Broady-Preston (2006) attempts to compare the degree of observation of professionalism within the CILIP, where the institute is considered for personal responsibility, commitments towards information and access, and the consideration of ethical accountability to the workplace and the information community. All these case discussions are examined in response to the outlined conditions published by each of these organizations. The institute carries the responsibility of serving the professionals through the provision of frameworks where sensitive aspects of ethical practice can be assessed in line with professional work (Broady-Preston, 2006). In CILIP, the code depends on personal responsibility, the responsibility of a professional to information and the users, colleagues and the general professional community and accountability towards society. The establishment of the code, therefore, is based on the responsibility of members of the institute towards work doing, which limits their capacity of operation to a defined demesne (Broady-Preston, 2006). For their implementation processes to be engaged, CILIP must command membership of other institutions and personnel, whereby they gain jurisdiction. Inasmuch as the institute is limited to this aspect, it possesses a large membership, thus making it a significant influence in the command of processes within the information professional community (Broady-Preston, 2006). Such elements mean that its principles, in a similar capacity to the ALA, have a sway on national and international definitions of ethical guidelines and principles. In this capability, these two bodies have directed (institutionalized) roles that restrict their functions in different settings, especially within the implementation.
The Canadian Library Association can be considered either as a functional body within its regional capacity or as an external influence towards international policies towards ideals in ethical work doing. Inasmuch as these aspects of information science and library operations may restrict organizations to geographical regions, this institution carries a larger sway on the overall principle of ethics in the field outside its region (Broady-Preston, 2006). An analytical study on CLA’s position on the formulation of ethical code offers a deeper comprehension of the necessity of such processes in the professional information community (McMenemy, Burton and Poulter, 2014). It not only carries the role on protection of intellectual freedom as a base principle, but its position statement also offers an understanding of the freedoms held by librarians compared to their responsibilities to society. In comparison to the role and position of the association, Rubin and Froehlich (2009) propose that its position as a participant in the political aspects of the debate on professionalism is significant towards the necessity of intellectual freedoms in the profession. The usage of responsibilities as a limitation on the ethical limiting practice is not considered in this settings, and their consideration of freedoms of the professional community is used as a generic platform to guide the role of creation and implementation of ethical roles. Such aspects not only cut out a particular function for this professional body, but it also defines the capacity of other affiliated operands such as the ALA and CILIP.
Theoretical Role of Professional Bodies
The theoretical positions held by any of the three institutions under analysis can be based on the guidelines that exist in specific institutions on a local level that control and govern the roles of professionals in different capacities. The significance of these functions is therefore limited to the degree of cooperation that smaller institutions carrying such facilities offer to the large bodies regarding collaboration and facilitating jurisdiction. The membership of professionals, according to Wilkinson (2014), is significant in the definition of the roles carried by these bodies. On an international level, for example, the ALA and CLA are limited by their geographical existent where membership does not apply. In the capacity possessed by either of these two bodies, the process of influencing ethics in the operation of libraries and information sciences is limited to the interactions with known members (Hamerly and Crowley, 2014). In the US and Canada, there exist requirements for professionals and establishments to be registered with a particular professional body; however, it would be impractical to assume complete dominance of either association within their region.
The capacity of either as a role in the influencing of ethical guidelines not only captures the efficiency of operation of these associations, but it also includes the drive of the professionals towards efficient and ethical operations. Wilkinson (2014) argues that the position of ethical bodies within the personal operating space of an individual, say a librarian, is defined by their own drive and the threat of an external controller of ethical repercussions. In this capacity, the prosecution of wrongdoings before each of these institutions also possesses an influence on the overall efficiency of delivering ethical positions of an entire profession. Also, Wilkinson (2014) considers the possibility of the existence of an overall oversight position by institutions such as CILIP that command the professional community on a larger scale through the combination of organizations on a local level. The joining of groups on such levels not only founds the principles held by the body on a lower level, but it also allows the individual to experience the presence of the oversight of a larger ethical professional body such as CILIP.
Assessment of Code Implementation
The ideals held by each of the three bodies under consideration are comparable and similar on various levels, ranging from their founding principles to the execution. In each of their capacities, it is essential that professionals within the system recognize that their functionality is in the association or institute to which their region or establishment subscribes to (McMenemy, Burton and Poulter, 2014). Additionally, their membership to a professional body is not only for their interests as professionals, but it also facilitates the service delivery to the public and other institutions affiliated to the profession. Apart from the discussion of these issues, code implementation within the capacity of an individualistic perspective is limited to the committing of ethical misconduct and the punitive measures that their professional institution can execute. In this regard, the possibility of punishment not only appeals to entire bodies, but it also trickles to the individual who is a member of a professional body and whose establishment subscribes to specified ethical organizations (McMenemy, Burton and Poulter, 2014).
Even though the significance of some of these bodies may seem superseded by the internal capacity of the information community towards self-governance, it is still possible to identify the weighty position they hold. Each possesses a capacity whereby the professionals can not ignore functionality of ethics due to the influence possessed in the continuous regulation and implementation of codes and supervisory policies (McMenemy, Burton and Poulter, 2014). In this case, it may be taken that the position of a professional body is subject to the level of influence possessed, which also relates to the commitments made by an individual towards a professional body. Additionally, consideration of the operating principles of institutions on local level base its ethical guidelines on the national organizations such as the CLA or the ALA, which houses them. Therefore, the jurisdiction of such practices as created and implemented by a larger institution still possesses the capacity to penetrate into the smallest of environments and with these principles functioning on every level, it is possible for a professional body to be in control of the community.[Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]
Practical Significance of Codes
Within this level of appreciation of the contribution of a larger professional body, it is possible for operative engagement of all personnel associated with functional levels. Ethics, as a control and disciplinary function within the profession, not only guides the interests of each body, but it also enables the public to interact with these professionals (Rubin and Froehlich, 2009). In this way, it not only practical that the application of ethical codes transcends the upper tiers of the organization, but it also applies to all members subject to these principles. Since each of these persons is a member of a professional body, their knowledge and skills are practically tied to the principles under discussion. On the other hand, it is possible to criticize the process based on the possibility of a large organization reaching all its members in a limited regional jurisdiction, in the scenario of CILIP, which functions on an institutional (rather than personal) level (Rubin and Froehlich, 2009). The practicality of each of the persons working in this setting not only defines their attitude towards work doing, but it also makes a standpoint for their noble intent to facilitate the usage and sharing of information as librarians and professionals.
Statement of Opinion in Relation to Concepts
In consideration of all aspects of the discussion, the position generated in connection with all areas is that the level of influence of an ethical process can only begin at the local level. The facilitation of membership of an institution and its employees and the overall participation in an ethical operation process relies on the interest of each locally operating establishment towards ethical standards, with contribution from the professional bodies and their role (Wilkinson, 2013). The participation of the large oversight platforms by ALA, CLA or CILIP, are affected primarily by these intents by the community of professionals towards their assistance in defining and applying ethical codes within their environments.[Click Essay Writer to order your essay]
In the general assessment of all discussed ideologies and standpoints on the ethical state of the procession, it is possible to conclude that the position of either professional body is controlled by membership, jurisdiction, and implementation mechanisms. The considered positions of either body facilitate the understanding of the role of a professional oversight in the operation and running of institutions in the provision of library and information services to the public. It also allows one to consider the possibility of contravention of ethical standards from any of these bodies, and the processes and jurisdiction that is taken at the local level and within the professional community. Since most of these ethical guidelines are aligned in the three associations considered, it is possible to summarize their role as functional adjudicators within the professional community with the calibration of standards. Each of these functionalities may not be fully envisioned in the public dimension, but their significance towards professional settings cannot be disregarded.
Broady-Preston, J., 2006. CILIP: a twenty-first century association for the information profession? Library Management, 27(1/2), pp.48-65.
Hamerly, D. and Crowley, B., 2014. Sustaining professionalism in the fields of library and information studies. Library Philosophy and Practice, [online]
McMenemy, D., Burton, P. and Poulter, A., 2014. A handbook of ethical practice: A practical guide to dealing with ethical issues in information and library work. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Rubin, R. and Froehlich, T., 2009. Ethical aspects of library and information science. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, [online] pp.1743-1757.
Wilkinson, L., 2014. Principlism and the ethics of librarianship. The Reference Librarian, 55(1), pp.1-25.