The popular Arab uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt brought to light the impediments to freedom with which activists are forced to contend. Most governments impose internet restrictions, which curtail the access that activists have to both information and audience. These restrictions are intended to protect the interests of the authoritarian governments. Likewise, they serve the purposes of limiting the influence of foreign pressure. Activists use the internet to mobilize and pressurize their governments to reinforce human rights. In the case of Tunisia and Egypt, before the restrictions imposed by the government, activists used the internet to document the atrocities that the government was committing to its citizens. [Click Essay Writer to order your essay]
In response to the restrictions, the US pledged $30 million in order to fund the development of new services and technologies that would allow the continuation of the activists’ activities regardless of the imposed restrictions (Hanson, 2012). This was based on the assertions that a closed and restricted internet limits the opportunities for peace and peace. Such restrictions also discourage innovation and entrepreneurship. It is with this reasons that the US stance on this issue becomes justified. There are several reasons that can be employed to validate this stance. Firstly, America has traditionally been an avid advocate of civil liberties in both the political and social settings. The American constitution stresses on the need to protect the civil liberties of its citizens as measure to trigger further collective development. Therefore, the funding of technologies that will allow subversion of the prevailing internet restrictions globally is an extension of the United States policies on human rights. This argument follows the premise that prevails that human rights online are same as the rights in the physical world (Hanson, 2012). [Click Essay Writer to order your essay]
Secondly, the United States record of accomplishment concerning e-diplomacy is impressive at a global level (Hanson, 2012). In comparison to all other countries, the United States is top rated in protecting the rights of internet users. As a superpower nation, the United States needs to reinforce the need to support internet usage at a global level. The presence of myriad internet sites that continuously assesses the performance of the US government is evidence of the freedom with which the country extends to its citizens. In addition, the United States has an objective approach to criticism on the internet, and that makes it an example that criticism can be manipulated to improve efficiencies in a country. However, the United States does not intend to condone any illegal activities and uses these funds to ensure such activities to enforce the same. Instead, it seeks to protect the global activists from subjection and torture, which are common with authoritarian governments. The US intends to use its initiatives, meet other nations, and convince them to revise their strategies on internet freedom (Hanson, 2012). It also enables the increased the metrics through which the opinions of other states are assessed. Through this meeting, it believes that different states will have the platform through which they can counter censorship and unnecessary censoring. This initiative is an extension of the US inclination towards the mitigation of the production of nuclear weapons by countries such as Iran. The United states understand that when all countries have unlimited internet usage then it could easily access information that could be used to boost its security.
In conclusion, the United States continues to face several challenges in its attempts to make internet freedom a global achievement. This line of action could also jeopardize the relations of the United States and other nations. In addition, it could further give the authoritarian governments reason to attack the internet activists. Countries such as China that limit internet freedom have all the necessary resources to fight this initiative and affect the progress of this program. [Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]
Hanson, F. (2012). Internet Freedom: The Role of the US State Department. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from Brookings