The Minersville School District v. Gobitis case was a legal tussle between the Minersville School District, a private learning institution, and Walter Gobitis, a parent in the institution. Walter Gobitis had instructed his children to pledge allegiance to the American flag while they were in school. Gobitis was an adherent to the Jehovah’s Witnesses religious circle. The circle prevailed against pledging allegiance to none other than the superior God. Inspired by previous dissents by adherents of the religious outfit, Gobitis prevailed upon his children against saluting the American flag and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.
Initially, two of the lower courts that listened to the case prevailed that Gobitis was right in his stance. The courts prevailed that forcing Gobitis’ children pledge allegiance was in direct contravention of their religious beliefs. According to these rulings, every person was guaranteed freedom from persecution as a result of their religious beliefs. The Minersville school district, dissatisfied with these rulings, appealed to the Supreme Court. On examination of the facts surrounding the case, the Supreme Court nullified the previous rulings by the lower courts. Unanimously, the Court declared that schools had the power to compel students to pledge their allegiance to the flag as it was the symbol of unity. The pledge of allegiance, according to the court, did not promote divergent religious principles. Instead, the pledge was a general sentiment intended to enhance national security. [“Write my essay for me?” Get help here.]
At the time of the case, flag pledges were inspired by a heightened patriotic fervor. Americans were reinforcing unity in the face of a myriad enemy. The unity gave them a sense of security. The case took place at a time when America was embroiled in a war with other nations. Flag pledges were a symbol of one’s loyalty to their country. It was a symbol of belonging to the American population. School’s taught children to obey the flag and collectively reinforce the pledge of allegiance. Only adherents of Jehovah’s Witnesses were against the phenomenon. Over time, an increased number of the adherent’s children refused to pledge their allegiances. These students were expelled from their respective learning institutions. Furthermore, teachers who projected Jehovah’s Witnesses’ inclinations. It was a wrong time to project dissent to popular doctrines in the US. [Need an essay writing service? Find help here
Conclusively, the case was an extension of the principles that underlie the politics of belonging in the USA. Essentially, when one expresses views that counteract the assertions of the majority, they are often deemed the enemies of the State. It is expected that one should align themselves with the majority views. The culture of belonging does not allow for dissenting views. Such views are often thought to be a form of betrayal. Nonetheless, popular views are not always correct. Divergent views allow for revision of the existing guiding frameworks. This greatly enhances the efficiencies of the legal frameworks. [Click Essay Writer to order your essay]